VA: Police to take graphic photos of teen as evidence

McLEAN, Va. (AP) — A Virginia teenager is fighting efforts by police who want to take photos of him in a sexually aroused state to try to prove a sexting case against him.

Prosecutors in Prince William County told a judge they need photos of the 17-year-old’s erect penis to compare against photos he is accused of sending to his 15-year-old girlfriend at the time. The teen has been charged in juvenile court with possessing and manufacturing child pornography related to the images of himself he’s accused of creating. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

so should these idiots be charged with forcibly arousing this human being? Then shold they be required to register? It sounds like the person masterminding this sick experiment is a deviant and should be put under public scrutiny – for life.
*
sounds an awful lot like the third reich…

Okay, I think this is the most insane thing I’ve ever heard of. I can’t imagine this will actually happen. No sane person (especially any Dr.) would participate in injecting the medication or the taking of these photos. Although these days, I could be proved wrong.

Yeah…. that would be insane. About as insane as telling an 80-year old man he cannot attend a family picnic in a public park because he had a 16 year old girlfriend 50 or 60 + years ago. That would be crazy, alright! That would never happen.

Wait, wait…

After the national uproar, the Virginia authorities have now backed off from serving this warrant.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/local/wp/2014/07/10/manassas-city-police-say-they-will-not-serve-search-warrant-in-teen-sexting-case/?hpid=z5

By the way, this whole thing began when the 15 year old girl had sent nude photos of herself first. I guess this mother is just claiming sexual harassment (and in the process attempting to ruin this individual’s life) so that she can convince herself she has an innocent daughter.

I think it is reasonable for the accused to file a separate lawsuit against the investigative team and their supervisors. At the very least, the media ought to do a full investigation of the investigators and expose and exploit this to the fullest extent.

This is good work by the prosecutor? One would think there would be bigger fish to fry instead of going after a couple of teenagers doing what teenagers have always done. I wonder if the girls mother even remembers how she felt when she was 15 and changing from a girl into a young woman. I’m not sure if any amount of good or bad parenting can stop a young person from exploring their sexuality once the young person makes up their mind that this is what they want to do.

Here is another take on it.

http://blog.simplejustice.us/2014/07/10/there-is-no-need-greater-than-evidence/

I read this guy every day but never post. He keeps very tight control of the comments, which is fine. Great read though. People are speaking out now.

This makes me want to puke!

Do we need any more evidence this needs to stop?

Praise God this case is getting the attention it is, and the reaction by the public shows they see how ridiculous it has become!